There are several existing solutions to run QDA Miner, WordStat, and Simstat on a Mac OS X computer. We have tested five different solutions, including Boot Camp, Parallels Desktop, VMWare Fusion, VirtualBox, and CrossOver. We present here a short overview of those solutions, as well as the result of a performance benchmark.
Hello, it seems i'm having problems on successful start of GekkoScience compact USB SHA-256 miner using MacMiner on Mac book Air 2015Mid (OS X El Capitan)- it gives constant lines (a help would appreciated). This post will guide you to write the PiMP OS image to a SATA or USB connected SSD or HDD using a Linux terminal. These instructions work on most linux flavors such as Debian/Ubuntu and Redhat/Fedora as well as Apple Mac OS X using the Terminal. Cudo Miner bridges the gap between powerful command line and simple-to-use GUI miners, with advanced features and monitoring unmatched by other leading mining software. A smart cryptocurrency miner that's both simple-to-use and advanced in control, enabling you to fine-tune your mining for maximum returns in multiple currency options. Mac mini (late 2009) is Core2 architecture, so select yam-yvg1900-M8a-macos64-core2.tgz. MacBook Pro (late 2013) is Haswell architecture, so select yam-yvg1900-M8a-macos64-haswell.tgz. If you don't know what CPU architecture your specific Apple computer has, check out the EveryMac.com website.
Thank you for downloading Gold Miner Joe - FULL version for Mac from our software portal. The application is licensed as shareware. Please bear in mind that the use of the software might be restricted in terms of time or functionality.
Running at full speed using Apple Boot Camp 4.0
The fastest way to run our software is to use Mac OS Boot Camp (free with the installation of OS X). This utility will create a second disk partition on your existing startup disk on which you will be able to install a Microsoft Windows system. To switch to Windows, reboot the computer and select the Windows operating system. Since Windows runs on its own hard drive partition and does not share resources or hardware with a running Mac OS, this type of installation is the fastest and the most compatible (trouble-free) way to run Windows software on a Mac computer. It does, however, require a reboot of the computer to switch from one operating system to another.
Running a virtual machine (VM) with VirtualBox, VMware Fusion, or Parallels
Another way to run Windows applications on a Mac is to create a virtual computer that supports the execution of Microsoft Windows. We are aware of three products that can run Windows:
VMWare Fusion (www.vmware.com) https://bcdownload.mystrikingly.com/blog/c-aft-mac-os.
Parallels Desktop (www.parallels.com)
Virtual Box (www.virtualbox.org), Free
The main benefit of this method is the ability to run both Windows and Mac OS applications concurrently, without having to reboot the computer. All three products offer some form of interaction between software applications in both operating systems, such as the ability to easily cut and paste or share files. However, since both operating systems require large amounts of memory, a memory upgrade is often recommended, especially if one needs to process large amount of text data in WordStat. Another minor inconvenience of such a solution is the slightly slower performance of Windows applications. This is due to the virtual machine accessing the hardware indirectly. Speed penalties depend on the type of applications run. Our own tests on time-consuming tasks in WordStat suggest that the average performance in a VM environment varies between 82% and 86% of the speed one would get by running our applications under Boot Camp or on a dedicated Windows computer (see Figure 1). Analyzing a corpus of 10 million words with WordStat would take about 26 seconds running Boot Camp, but would range from 30 to 32 seconds when running a VM solution. Please note however that such a speed penalty may be negligible in everyday use of the software.
Running without Windows using CrossOver
Many of our customers have chosen CrossOver (from www.codeweavers.com), or its open-source counterpart, Wine. The main benefit of such a solution is the ability to run Windows software on a Mac without installing Windows. Besides representing a cheaper alternative (one does not need to purchase a license for Microsoft Windows), it allows the user to start Windows applications much more quickly since there is no need to reboot the computer or start a Windows session in a Virtual Machine. Hunt for vengeance mac os. Such benefits come however at the cost of slower performance as well as potential minor compatibility issues. Our own speed tests suggest that memory and disk-intensive tasks may take up to twice as long to perform as they may take in Boot Camp, yet on typical smaller projects, Crossover can achieve performances near to that of the fastest installation. Again, on small projects, a difference in speed may be unnoticeable. One should also note that while QDA Miner, Simstat, and WordStat are able to run on a Mac with CrossOver, many other Windows applications cannot be run on CrossOver.
How fast are those solutions?
We tested the speed of WordStat content analysis and text mining module using the five above-mentioned Mac OS installations. We ran WordStat from our qualitative data analysis software QDA Miner. Two datasets were used as benchmarks: a dataset of 916 documents, totaling 2.25 million words, as well as a second dataset of 174,222 short responses, totaling 3.35 million words. We performed three tasks on each data set: 1) a word frequency analysis; 2) a phrase extraction, and 3) a thematic content analysis using the Regressive Imagery Dictionary. Figure 1 presents the relative performance of those five solutions, compared to the fastest performance one could get while running Windows with Boot Camp.
Figure 1. Average and Maximum Performance of WordStat
using various MacOS installations relative to Boot Camp
All tests were performed on a MacBook Pro with a 2.5ghz Intel i5 processor, 500 GB hard drive, and 4 GB of memory. Virtual Machine solutions were configured to use two processors and 1.5 GB of memory. Please note that these results are not necessarily representative of the general performance of these products when running other types of applications; they only reflect typical performances when running the most common time-consuming tasks in WordStat. Speed should not be the sole criterion in product selection since each VM solution differs in the way they integrate with Mac OS X and in how they support specific computer hardware.
What is the recommended configuration?
The following table presents the minimum memory requirement for running QDA Miner, WordStat, and Simstat on a Mac computer. For VM solutions or CrossOver, the minimum memory requirement is 2 GB of memory when running Windows XP, but we strongly recommend at least 4 GB for running our software under Windows 7 and 8.
Boot Camp | Parallels Desktop | CrossOver | |
Minimum requirement | 2 GB of memory | 2 to 4 GB of memory | 2 to 4 GB of memory |
Recommended | 4 GB of memory | 6 to 8 GB of memory | 6 to 8 GB of memory |
How to install Provalis Research software on a Mac computer?
If you're using a solution that requires to install Windows on your Mac, you can just follow the regular installation process of Provalis Research software on a Windows machine. If you would like to run the software on your Mac computer using Crossover, you can read the following blog. Wine is another existing solution that allows you to run QDA Miner or WordStat on your mac without Windows. To learn how to install our software on a Mac using Wine, read the following blog.
Since the dawn of Mac OS X, there have been major and minor versions. That is, versions that introduced major features and those that focus mainly on speed improvements and streamlining, bringing only small new features or additions.
The Mac OS X Public Beta was the public's first exposure to Mac OS X.
Pre-Puma
The early years of OS X were a rough ride. How Apple managed to release OS X in its 10.0 and 10.1 state I do not know. We Mac users ridiculed Windows as being an unfinished, bug-ridden operating systems, and then Apple went from the rock solid beast that was Mac OS 8 and 9 (rock solid without third-party additions, which could make things unstable) to the early versions of OS X that could barely last a few hours without crashing.
Mac OS X 10.0 Cheetah really was not ready for prime time.
Puma to Jaguar
OS X 10.1 Puma with its customisable interface, better networking, and the addition of hundreds of third party drivers made it the first useable version of OS X. This was reflected in the fact that it was offered as a free upgrade from OS X 10.0 Cheetah. We tend to disregard Cheetah as a proper version of OS X – and quite rightly so. While it was an improvement over the Public Beta, it was still a horrible version. Nonetheless, it was what I would class as a major version – the first major version – because of the improvements it brought with it.
Mac OS X 10.1 Puma made OS X a bit more usable than 10.0.
OS X 10.2 Jaguar was a minor revision. It brought speed improvements and added stability over Puma as well as adding minor new features such as Quartz Extreme, an updated Mail, iChat, Bluetooth, and Rendevous (later renamed Bonjour). Because of the speed and stability it brought a lot of people consider this the first usable version of OS X. It was the first version I ran as my main OS since OS 9.
Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar was the first generally usable version of OS X.
Panther to Tiger
OS X 10.3 Panther was a major revision. Not only did it clean up the whole OS, it brought AES encryption, improved Finder, Font Book, and Xcode, and it introduced Fast User Switching (which also brought the 3D cube animation for switching users). It was further streamlined over 10.2. While 10.2 was good, Apple still had a long way to go to refine OS X, and Panther was another step forward.
Mac OS X 10.3 Panther made significant improvements in Classic Mode.
OS X 10.4 Tiger, which is the most respected version of OS X, was really a minor revision. The speed optimisation over Panther was amazing. I always found Panther (while better than previous versions) clunky and slow. Tiger, on the other hand, ran much better even on unsupported hardware. It brought a more unified look through out the whole OS, as well as Spotlight, improved 64-bit addressing, and a new version of Safari.
Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger lasted 2-1/2 years before it was replaced.
Tiger is the longest serving version of OS X to date, giving testimony to how great it was. It would run on a 300 MHz G3 from 1998 all the way up to Core Duo Intel Macs from 2006. Now that's impressive.
We tested the speed of WordStat content analysis and text mining module using the five above-mentioned Mac OS installations. We ran WordStat from our qualitative data analysis software QDA Miner. Two datasets were used as benchmarks: a dataset of 916 documents, totaling 2.25 million words, as well as a second dataset of 174,222 short responses, totaling 3.35 million words. We performed three tasks on each data set: 1) a word frequency analysis; 2) a phrase extraction, and 3) a thematic content analysis using the Regressive Imagery Dictionary. Figure 1 presents the relative performance of those five solutions, compared to the fastest performance one could get while running Windows with Boot Camp.
Figure 1. Average and Maximum Performance of WordStat
using various MacOS installations relative to Boot Camp
All tests were performed on a MacBook Pro with a 2.5ghz Intel i5 processor, 500 GB hard drive, and 4 GB of memory. Virtual Machine solutions were configured to use two processors and 1.5 GB of memory. Please note that these results are not necessarily representative of the general performance of these products when running other types of applications; they only reflect typical performances when running the most common time-consuming tasks in WordStat. Speed should not be the sole criterion in product selection since each VM solution differs in the way they integrate with Mac OS X and in how they support specific computer hardware.
What is the recommended configuration?
The following table presents the minimum memory requirement for running QDA Miner, WordStat, and Simstat on a Mac computer. For VM solutions or CrossOver, the minimum memory requirement is 2 GB of memory when running Windows XP, but we strongly recommend at least 4 GB for running our software under Windows 7 and 8.
Boot Camp | Parallels Desktop | CrossOver | |
Minimum requirement | 2 GB of memory | 2 to 4 GB of memory | 2 to 4 GB of memory |
Recommended | 4 GB of memory | 6 to 8 GB of memory | 6 to 8 GB of memory |
How to install Provalis Research software on a Mac computer?
If you're using a solution that requires to install Windows on your Mac, you can just follow the regular installation process of Provalis Research software on a Windows machine. If you would like to run the software on your Mac computer using Crossover, you can read the following blog. Wine is another existing solution that allows you to run QDA Miner or WordStat on your mac without Windows. To learn how to install our software on a Mac using Wine, read the following blog.
Since the dawn of Mac OS X, there have been major and minor versions. That is, versions that introduced major features and those that focus mainly on speed improvements and streamlining, bringing only small new features or additions.
The Mac OS X Public Beta was the public's first exposure to Mac OS X.
Pre-Puma
The early years of OS X were a rough ride. How Apple managed to release OS X in its 10.0 and 10.1 state I do not know. We Mac users ridiculed Windows as being an unfinished, bug-ridden operating systems, and then Apple went from the rock solid beast that was Mac OS 8 and 9 (rock solid without third-party additions, which could make things unstable) to the early versions of OS X that could barely last a few hours without crashing.
Mac OS X 10.0 Cheetah really was not ready for prime time.
Puma to Jaguar
OS X 10.1 Puma with its customisable interface, better networking, and the addition of hundreds of third party drivers made it the first useable version of OS X. This was reflected in the fact that it was offered as a free upgrade from OS X 10.0 Cheetah. We tend to disregard Cheetah as a proper version of OS X – and quite rightly so. While it was an improvement over the Public Beta, it was still a horrible version. Nonetheless, it was what I would class as a major version – the first major version – because of the improvements it brought with it.
Mac OS X 10.1 Puma made OS X a bit more usable than 10.0.
OS X 10.2 Jaguar was a minor revision. It brought speed improvements and added stability over Puma as well as adding minor new features such as Quartz Extreme, an updated Mail, iChat, Bluetooth, and Rendevous (later renamed Bonjour). Because of the speed and stability it brought a lot of people consider this the first usable version of OS X. It was the first version I ran as my main OS since OS 9.
Mac OS X 10.2 Jaguar was the first generally usable version of OS X.
Panther to Tiger
OS X 10.3 Panther was a major revision. Not only did it clean up the whole OS, it brought AES encryption, improved Finder, Font Book, and Xcode, and it introduced Fast User Switching (which also brought the 3D cube animation for switching users). It was further streamlined over 10.2. While 10.2 was good, Apple still had a long way to go to refine OS X, and Panther was another step forward.
Mac OS X 10.3 Panther made significant improvements in Classic Mode.
OS X 10.4 Tiger, which is the most respected version of OS X, was really a minor revision. The speed optimisation over Panther was amazing. I always found Panther (while better than previous versions) clunky and slow. Tiger, on the other hand, ran much better even on unsupported hardware. It brought a more unified look through out the whole OS, as well as Spotlight, improved 64-bit addressing, and a new version of Safari.
Mac OS X 10.4 Tiger lasted 2-1/2 years before it was replaced.
Tiger is the longest serving version of OS X to date, giving testimony to how great it was. It would run on a 300 MHz G3 from 1998 all the way up to Core Duo Intel Macs from 2006. Now that's impressive.
While a minor version, the streamlining and optimisation was amazing.
Leopard to Snow Leopard
OS X 10.5 Leopard was a long time coming and a much needed update. It was the first version of OS X to seriously increase the system requirements, dropping the whole G3 range and early, slower G4s too, a mass culling culture that Apple would continue in future versions. This was mainly due to its heavy reliance on the graphics chip to perform fancy new effects. According to Apple, it contained over 300 new features and changes, including redesigned Dock and Finder, Cover Flow, Time Machine, Front Row, and Photo Booth.
This was the only version of OS X that could be installed to run on both PowerPC and Intel Macs. (There were separate PowerPC and Intel versions of Tiger.)
Mac OS X 10.5 Leopard supports both PowerPC and Intel Macs.
Snow Leopard to Lion
OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard was a minor revision, although this could be argued. It was a major streamlining of Leopard and the first version of OS X to only run on Intel hardware. It was the first release that was primarily targeted by Apple for its speed improvements, streamlining, and having a smaller footprint rather than lots of new features. But the smaller footprint could primarily be put down to losing the PowerPC code.
Super meat ball mac os. Apple certainly pulled it off. Snow Leopard is a lot faster than Leopard on the same hardware and one of the most stable versions of the OS to be released.
OS X 10.6 Snow Leopard is Intel only – and the last to run PowerPC software.
Lion to Mountain Lion
Bet big dollar. OS X 10.7 Lion was a major release. It was the third time that Apple dropped large amounts of older hardware from its supported list. Where Snow Leopard dropped all PowerPC Macs, Lion would drop all 32-bit Macs, only running on Core 2 Duo Macs.
While not adding lots of new features like other major versions, it altered the path of OS X. It would see Apple bring OS X more in line with iOS, such as LaunchPad and resuming apps from their previous state. It also cut out any support for PowerPC apps, which was handled using the Rosetta emulation engine in Tiger, Leopard, and Snow Leopard.
OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion is set for release in a few weeks, and this is looking to be a minor revision, with reports of it running much better than Lion on the same hardware and it further integrating itself with the whole iOS feel.
While Mountain Lion will run on practically the same hardware it does require a fully 64-bit capable machine. Some Core 2 Duo Macs while being 64-bit capable are hindered by having only a 32-bit EFI meaning they can boot to a full native 64-bit kernel and this stops them running Mountain Lion.
New iOS-inspired features include Messages (compatible with the iOS version), Notification Center, and Reminders.
OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion makes even more graphical demands.
In Snow Leopard, my Early 2009 MacBook can't boot into 64-bit mode, but under Lion it will, so there is hope that some machines will get added to the list of ones supported in Mountain Lion.
A Miner Matter Mac Os X
Alphabet soup (crawlspace) mac os. Mountain Lion also requires a fairly top-end graphics chip, cutting out some of those Macs with early integrated chips like the Intel GMA 950 and X3100, ensuring users gets a premium experience rather than a sluggish 'minimum requirements' experience like Microsoft.
10.9 and Beyond
Where Apple is going after Mountain Lion is hard to guess. The Apple world moves so fast lately, but one thing for sure is they seem set on merging OS X and iOS.
OS X 10.9 is set to be another major version, but what it will bring is anyone's guess.
Follow Simon Royal on Twitter or send him an Email.
Like what you have read? Send Simon a donation via Tip Jar.
keywords: #macosx #minor #major #tiger #leopard #snowleopard #panther #version#techspectrum #simonroyal
short link: http://goo.gl/G7y2ak
A Miner Matter Mac Os Download
searchword: osxmajorminor